<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Archaeological Finds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballardian.com/archaeological-finds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballardian.com/archaeological-finds</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.ballardian.com/archaeological-finds/comment-page-1#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 13:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballardian.com/archaeological-finds/#comment-797</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll pop this here in Simon&#039;s absence - a &lt;a href=&quot;http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/visualart/story/0,,2088399,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new essay&lt;/a&gt; from JGB on Dali and film, to tie in the Tate&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/daliandfilm/default.shtm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;current exhibition&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;i&gt;Most important of all, though, in our revaluation of Dali, is the lens through which we see his paintings. We no longer live in a literary culture, and the human eye has been fine-tuned by a half-century of film and television. Dali&#039;s paintings, with their distant horizon lines, pseudo-Renaissance perspectives and mentalised stage-sets, are naturals for the age of the plasma TV screen. Our attention spans have shrunk to a single film-frame, and when we look at a Dali painting we can instantly construct the rest of the movie from the key frame that he offers us.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll pop this here in Simon&#8217;s absence &#8211; a <a href="http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/visualart/story/0,,2088399,00.html" rel="nofollow">new essay</a> from JGB on Dali and film, to tie in the Tate&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/daliandfilm/default.shtm" rel="nofollow">current exhibition</a>.<br />
<i>Most important of all, though, in our revaluation of Dali, is the lens through which we see his paintings. We no longer live in a literary culture, and the human eye has been fine-tuned by a half-century of film and television. Dali&#8217;s paintings, with their distant horizon lines, pseudo-Renaissance perspectives and mentalised stage-sets, are naturals for the age of the plasma TV screen. Our attention spans have shrunk to a single film-frame, and when we look at a Dali painting we can instantly construct the rest of the movie from the key frame that he offers us.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

