<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;What exactly is he trying to sell?&#039;: J.G. Ballard&#039;s Adventures in Advertising, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballardian.com/jg-ballards-adventures-in-advertising-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballardian.com/jg-ballards-adventures-in-advertising-2</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henry Schlarb</title>
		<link>http://www.ballardian.com/jg-ballards-adventures-in-advertising-2/comment-page-1#comment-4785</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Schlarb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballardian.com/?p=1639#comment-4785</guid>
		<description>Hello. 
I have a first edition copy of Atrocity Exhibition (Jonathan Cape Ltd, 30 Bedford Square, London WC1, 1970). In it, the character is Claire Austin, not Catherine Austin. When did this get revised?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.<br />
I have a first edition copy of Atrocity Exhibition (Jonathan Cape Ltd, 30 Bedford Square, London WC1, 1970). In it, the character is Claire Austin, not Catherine Austin. When did this get revised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.ballardian.com/jg-ballards-adventures-in-advertising-2/comment-page-1#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballardian.com/?p=1639#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments...

Tim: I&#039;m sure my memories of that campaign&#039;s details are vague, but at least I got the line right and it&#039;s still a great example of advertising&#039;s hold on politics and the technique of dressing up a cliché in new clothes.

Mike H: Thanks. I should admit right now I didn&#039;t do the billboard mock-up and I think Simon assumed I did. I found it on the web some time over the last 10 years, and had it stored in my JGB pix files... it is cool, tho -- you can immediately see how unsuited &quot;Project for a New Novel&quot; is for the medium. The advertising in Kingdom Come is probably worth an entire article on its own, as I didn&#039;t &quot;pay off&quot; the campaign by correlating Pearson&#039;s creative output to the overall plot and a psychosocial look at the madding crowds. I agree -- it&#039;s a lot more complex a story than was given credit.

Mike B: Thanks. I think the mind-blower for me was actually having the realization that the Advertiser&#039;s Announcements were, in fact, &quot;real&quot; Atrocity Exhibition ads. The overlay of Claire and Catherine seemed much too contrived to be otherwise. As for all the Catherines in JG -- the ones before he met Claire must simply be coincidence... altho I&#039;ll defer to the name master, David Pringle, on that score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments&#8230;</p>
<p>Tim: I&#8217;m sure my memories of that campaign&#8217;s details are vague, but at least I got the line right and it&#8217;s still a great example of advertising&#8217;s hold on politics and the technique of dressing up a cliché in new clothes.</p>
<p>Mike H: Thanks. I should admit right now I didn&#8217;t do the billboard mock-up and I think Simon assumed I did. I found it on the web some time over the last 10 years, and had it stored in my JGB pix files&#8230; it is cool, tho &#8212; you can immediately see how unsuited &#8220;Project for a New Novel&#8221; is for the medium. The advertising in Kingdom Come is probably worth an entire article on its own, as I didn&#8217;t &#8220;pay off&#8221; the campaign by correlating Pearson&#8217;s creative output to the overall plot and a psychosocial look at the madding crowds. I agree &#8212; it&#8217;s a lot more complex a story than was given credit.</p>
<p>Mike B: Thanks. I think the mind-blower for me was actually having the realization that the Advertiser&#8217;s Announcements were, in fact, &#8220;real&#8221; Atrocity Exhibition ads. The overlay of Claire and Catherine seemed much too contrived to be otherwise. As for all the Catherines in JG &#8212; the ones before he met Claire must simply be coincidence&#8230; altho I&#8217;ll defer to the name master, David Pringle, on that score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bonsall</title>
		<link>http://www.ballardian.com/jg-ballards-adventures-in-advertising-2/comment-page-1#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bonsall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballardian.com/?p=1639#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Rick, lots of interesting ideas there.

I particularly like: &quot; Claire Churchill is not only Claire Churchill, but Ballard’s stand-in for Catherine Austin. And further, that each ad represents a conceptualization of not only Claire Churchill, but of the varied, perverse and geometric sexuality of The Atrocity Exhibition.&quot;

There are many Catherines in Ballard&#039;s work, the Catherine Austin who survives the Drought to appear in the Atrocity Exhibition, Catherine York of Storm-Bird, Storm-Dreamer, and the missing wife in Concrete Island.  I was interested to read in Claire&#039;s memoir of Ballard in the Observer:

&quot;As Ballard admitted once, Catherine, the fantasy emerging from the car wrecks of Crash, was entirely based on an idea of Walsh. &quot;She was even originally called Claire in the book,&quot; Walsh recalls. &quot;And had I really been a cross between Mother Teresa and Marilyn Monroe, as the portrait suggested, I might have been keen for that to go ahead. But I persuaded him to change the name in the end.&quot;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/apr/26/jg-ballard-appreciation-claire-walsh

Are all these Catherines really Claire in disguise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Rick, lots of interesting ideas there.</p>
<p>I particularly like: &#8221; Claire Churchill is not only Claire Churchill, but Ballard’s stand-in for Catherine Austin. And further, that each ad represents a conceptualization of not only Claire Churchill, but of the varied, perverse and geometric sexuality of The Atrocity Exhibition.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are many Catherines in Ballard&#8217;s work, the Catherine Austin who survives the Drought to appear in the Atrocity Exhibition, Catherine York of Storm-Bird, Storm-Dreamer, and the missing wife in Concrete Island.  I was interested to read in Claire&#8217;s memoir of Ballard in the Observer:</p>
<p>&#8220;As Ballard admitted once, Catherine, the fantasy emerging from the car wrecks of Crash, was entirely based on an idea of Walsh. &#8220;She was even originally called Claire in the book,&#8221; Walsh recalls. &#8220;And had I really been a cross between Mother Teresa and Marilyn Monroe, as the portrait suggested, I might have been keen for that to go ahead. But I persuaded him to change the name in the end.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/apr/26/jg-ballard-appreciation-claire-walsh" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/apr/26/jg-ballard-appreciation-claire-walsh</a></p>
<p>Are all these Catherines really Claire in disguise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike H</title>
		<link>http://www.ballardian.com/jg-ballards-adventures-in-advertising-2/comment-page-1#comment-3595</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballardian.com/?p=1639#comment-3595</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, Rick!

I particularly like your mock-up of how &quot;Project for a New Novel&quot; would have looked on billboards.

And I&#039;m glad you considered &quot;Kingdom Come&quot;. Some people regard it as representing a drop in Ballard&#039;s standards, but I think there&#039;s lots of fascinating ideas in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, Rick!</p>
<p>I particularly like your mock-up of how &#8220;Project for a New Novel&#8221; would have looked on billboards.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m glad you considered &#8220;Kingdom Come&#8221;. Some people regard it as representing a drop in Ballard&#8217;s standards, but I think there&#8217;s lots of fascinating ideas in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimC</title>
		<link>http://www.ballardian.com/jg-ballards-adventures-in-advertising-2/comment-page-1#comment-3594</link>
		<dc:creator>TimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballardian.com/?p=1639#comment-3594</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been referenced! I feel honoured.

The reference to the Saatchi &amp; Saatchi (SP) advert for the Tories isn&#039;t accurate, though - the famous version wasn&#039;t all-white or centred, though there may have been other versions that were. See, for example, the repro at the Daily Mail (an entirely appropriate source for any discussion of fascist/consumerist media) -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1172516/Darling-pledges-3-1bn-help-people-work--jobless-total-hit-3m.html
The campaign has recently been revived as &#039;Labour still isn&#039;t working&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been referenced! I feel honoured.</p>
<p>The reference to the Saatchi &amp; Saatchi (SP) advert for the Tories isn&#8217;t accurate, though &#8211; the famous version wasn&#8217;t all-white or centred, though there may have been other versions that were. See, for example, the repro at the Daily Mail (an entirely appropriate source for any discussion of fascist/consumerist media) -<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1172516/Darling-pledges-3-1bn-help-people-work--jobless-total-hit-3m.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1172516/Darling-pledges-3-1bn-help-people-work&#8211;jobless-total-hit-3m.html</a><br />
The campaign has recently been revived as &#8216;Labour still isn&#8217;t working&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
